Avoma vs Zell

Avoma captures meetings with a bot and provides transcripts, summaries, and action items. It works on the web, iOS, and Android, and captures meetings on Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Webex, and GoToMeeting. Transcription supports 62 languages, and calendar integrations are included. A free view-only user can watch recordings, view notes and transcripts, comment, and share. Paid plans are billed annually: Startup costs $19 a month for up to 25 paid seats, and Organization costs $29 a month for up to 100 paid seats. Both include unlimited free view-only seats. Enterprise costs $39 a month, is billed annually only, and requires at least 10 paid seats. Avoma was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Palo Alto, California, United States.

Zell turns sales conversations into daily practice for representatives and coaching priorities for managers. It analyzes video calls, phone calls, and in-person meetings, then gives each representative a focus skill and short drill based on recent calls. Managers can see who needs attention, what to coach, and whether behavior improves across later conversations. Listed functions include transcription, objection detection, coaching scorecards, next-step extraction, and CRM synchronization. Transcripts and feedback can be automatically translated into a manager’s language. For hiring, Zell offers AI role-play assessments where candidates speak with an AI buyer; the company makes hiring decisions rather than the AI. Training includes role-play scenarios, custom scorecards, structured courses, and recurring or one-time tasks. Integrations cover CRM, meeting, and learning systems, with Slack notifications documented. Zell MCP connects a workspace to Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code, or Codex through OAuth and requires Zell AI access. Pricing is available on request.