FrontCore vs IOTA360 Evaluations

FrontCore provides cloud-based training management and learning management tools for professional training providers. Its Training Management System (TMS) covers course administration, participant management, and training operations, with course and delegate management, booking, and routine automation. Listed capabilities also include class scheduling, learner registration, attendance and certification tracking, instructor management, waitlists, and automated reminders.

The Learning Management System (LMS) includes course management and video training, with AI tools for generating quizzes, transcribing lectures, and creating subtitles. Learners can access and deliver courses using mobile devices. FrontCore says the LMS is GDPR-compliant and describes trust and security measures. The platform is available on Android, iOS, web, and API. Integrations include Zapier, HubSpot, Moodle, Xledger, Thinkific, Visma.net, Xero, Fortnox, SuperOffice, and Google Calendar; users can also sync key data through API and ready-made connectors. LMS Start is free for up to 30 participants. Paid LMS plans add a £0,8 per-active-user engagement fee. TMS plans start at £60/mo, and new TMS customers must pay a startup investment for training and configuration.

IOTA360 Evaluations is online course evaluation software for higher education institutions. Institutions can use a managed service for scheduling, reminder emails, survey delivery, LMS integration, student and faculty support, reporting, and results permissions, or administer the system in-house. It supports unlimited evaluation sessions within an academic term and dynamic scheduling for courses of different lengths. Reports include instructor benchmarks and comparisons, graphical summaries, word-frequency and historical analysis, and a custom report builder. Results can be exported to Excel, PDF, and CSV; historical data can be imported from TXT, CSV, and XML formats. The software can run standalone or integrate with an LMS, campus portal, or SIS through methods including LTI, LDAP, CAS, Shibboleth, SAML, Google Auth, and Custom API. Stored responses are not linked to identifying student information in reports or downloads unless students identify themselves in comments. The brochure describes anonymized, encrypted data, FERPA compliance, and role-based access. Students can submit evaluations and faculty can view results on mobile devices.