GradeBoard vs RubriqFlow

GradeBoard is a web-based grading platform for educators that uses AI to provide feedback aligned with rubric outcomes. It accepts PDF, DOCX, TXT, and image uploads, and OCR extracts text from images. Its analysis compares learner work semantically with rubrics and generates inline comments, summative feedback, and annotations that can be edited before export. Batch processing is listed for 50 or more submissions at once. Analytics track performance trends, time savings, and student progress distribution. Free costs nothing and includes 10 learner submissions, a standard AI model, limited rubric uploads, annotated DOCX downloads, basic analytics, 30-day data retention, and email support. Pro costs £24.99 a month for 200 submissions, a priority AI model, batch grading, advanced developmental feedback, OCR, and six-month retention. Enterprise is listed from £250 a month, billed From, and includes unlimited submissions, SSO, team management, custom API/LMS integration, 12-month retention, and a dedicated success manager. Paid plans list annotated DOCX and batch feedback ZIP downloads. The registration page says GradeBoard complies with GDPR and other data protection regulations.

RubriqFlow is a web platform for higher education institutions evaluating student portfolios for academic credit. Students submit documents, artifacts, and evidence of prior learning for faculty review. Faculty score submissions against weighted criteria and standardized levels, and those scores map to recommended credits; faculty can override a recommendation with a justification. The workflow runs from submission through credentialing, with an audit trail for credit determinations. RubriqFlow describes a multi-tenant setup with separate organization data, department management, and centralized administration. It lists Student, Faculty, Org Admin, and Super Admin roles, with faculty assigned to subjects to access relevant portfolios. Faculty and staff accounts are free. Student access is $5 a month, billed at $5 per student per semester with no setup fees; enterprise pricing is custom and not listed. The homepage states WCAG 2.1 AA verification and Section 508 support, and reports 33 of 33 tests passed in October 2025. FileDrop states that it operates in compliance with FERPA and uses education records exclusively to evaluate and award prior learning credit. It says portfolio files are privately stored and downloads require authenticated authorization. Enterprise agreements include dedicated support, and a Help Center and Contact Us page are listed.