IntelGrader vs RubriqFlow

IntelGrader has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.

RubriqFlow is a web platform for higher education institutions evaluating student portfolios for academic credit. Students submit documents, artifacts, and evidence of prior learning for faculty review. Faculty score submissions against weighted criteria and standardized levels, and those scores map to recommended credits; faculty can override a recommendation with a justification. The workflow runs from submission through credentialing, with an audit trail for credit determinations. RubriqFlow describes a multi-tenant setup with separate organization data, department management, and centralized administration. It lists Student, Faculty, Org Admin, and Super Admin roles, with faculty assigned to subjects to access relevant portfolios. Faculty and staff accounts are free. Student access is $5 a month, billed at $5 per student per semester with no setup fees; enterprise pricing is custom and not listed. The homepage states WCAG 2.1 AA verification and Section 508 support, and reports 33 of 33 tests passed in October 2025. FileDrop states that it operates in compliance with FERPA and uses education records exclusively to evaluate and award prior learning credit. It says portfolio files are privately stored and downloads require authenticated authorization. Enterprise agreements include dedicated support, and a Help Center and Contact Us page are listed.