Lano Contractor Management vs Papaya Global
Lano Contractor Management
lano.io
Papaya Global
papayaglobal.comSide by side
| Figure | Lano Contractor Management | Papaya Global |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | €3/mo | $5/mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| iOS | — | Yes |
| Android | — | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 4 | 10 |
| Spec score · Employer of Record Software | 8.7 (#2) | 8.8 (#1) |
| Spec score · Contractor Management Software | 8.8 (#2) | 9.0 (#1) |
| Spec score · Contractor Payment Software | 8.8 (#4) | 9.0 (#2) |
| Global coverage | Lano says its network supports hiring and payroll operations in more than 170 countries. | The global payroll product states support for more than 180 countries. |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | LinkedIn lists New York, New York as headquarters, while the World Economic Forum profile lists Israel as headquarters. |
| Integrations | Listed integrations include CANDIS, DATEV, QuickBooks, Xero, Coupa, Microsoft Dynamics, Workday Adaptive Planning, Auth0, Okta, Google Drive, Jira, Microsoft, Salesforce, Adobe Sign and DocuSign. | Listed connectors include Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle HCM, NetSuite, BambooHR, HiBob, Expensify, UKG, Sage and VMS systems. |
| Licence | The contractor terms grant access to Lano software as a hosted platform and do not state an open-source licence. | Papaya's terms describe the platform materials and software as proprietary intellectual property rather than open-source software. |
| Limit: pricing | A G2 reviewer says Lano is somewhat more expensive than competitors. | Reviewers describe Papaya as expensive, and independent analysis says minimum spend, contract term and FX markup are not published. |
| Payments | Lano supports one-click contractor payouts and local-currency payments in 28 currencies. | Payments OS supports global worker and statutory payments, funding in 15 or more currencies, payment tracking and automated reconciliation. |
| Rating on G2 | 4.0 out of 5 from 16 reviews | 4.5 out of 5 from 55 reviews |
| Rating on Gartner Peer Insights | No rating from 0 reviews | 4.2 out of 5 from 9 reviews |
| Rating on GetApp | 4.5 out of 5 from 19 reviews | 4.5 out of 5 from 43 reviews |
| Rating on Trustpilot | 2.9 out of 5 from 2 reviews | 4.2 out of 5 from 58 reviews |
Plans
Lano Contractor Management
- Payroll consolidation€3 a month
- Contractor Management€19 a month
- Multi-Country Payroll€19 a month
- Employer of Record€499 a month
Papaya Global
- Payroll Plus$29 a month
- Contractor solution$5 a month
- Contractor of Record$199 a month
- Employer of Record$499 a month
- Payments OS (OnePay)Free
- Papaya Time Compliance$6 a month
- Papaya Time Enterprise$8 a month
- Contractor of Record (COR)$199 a month
- Employer of Record (EOR)$499 a month
- Workforce OSPriced on request
In their own words
Lano Contractor Management
Lano Contractor Management is a web-based workforce platform for companies hiring and managing international contractors. Its standard offer includes a talent pool, applicant tracking, task management, compliance, invoice management, and global payments. Lano states that it supports contractor operations in more than 170 countries and 28 currencies, with localized contracts intended to help companies address local laws. Contractors receive a free invoicing tool and a digital wallet for multi-currency payments; Lano says contractors use the platform at no charge and corporate clients pay the fees. Three compliance sendings and three invoices are available free before Control and Intelligence modules require an upgrade. Integrations include accounting, HR, signing, and other tools, but access requires booking the Intelligence module. Lano API access is in closed beta for selected customers. Lano states it has SOC 2 Type II certification and is GDPR compliant, with AES-256 encrypted S3 storage and TLS 1.2 encryption in transit and at rest. Contractor Management costs €19 per month, with volume discounts available.
Papaya Global
Papaya Global has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.