MySQL vs Ubiq Dynamic Data Masking

MySQL has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.

Ubiq Dynamic Data Masking protects sensitive data by determining at runtime what a requesting identity receives. Depending on the identity, application, service account, API, or workflow, the same value can appear as cleartext, masked, tokenized, format-preserving protected, or encrypted data. Sensitive values can remain protected at rest while policy determines their runtime form. Ubiq supports both permanent masked copies for development, test, vendor, and analytics use and runtime decisions for production access. Connections include SDKs, APIs, SQL UDFs, and database and data warehouse integrations; its catalog lists 49+ integrations, including PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Snowflake, Databricks, and Tableau. Ubiq says it deploys inside the customer’s environment, does not operate as a masking proxy between applications and databases, and can protect data without schema changes where applicable. Customers can use their own HSM or KMS to retain key control. Enterprise Edition pricing is usage-based through a private offer, and additional AWS infrastructure costs may apply. A 30-day trial is listed; there is no free plan.