Pawtograder vs RubriqFlow

Pawtograder combines autograding, manual grading, office hours, discussion, a gradebook, and analytics for computer science courses. Each commit can trigger tests through GitHub Actions, with results shown by test in the grading interface. Rubrics support additive, deductive, and multi-level criteria, line-level annotations, and separate scoring for group members. The gradebook includes MathJS expression columns, drop-lowest calculations, CSV import, and a student what-if mode. Office hours queues support text, video, and screen sharing, and can show linked submissions and failing tests. Discussions can surface relevant threads for known errors and allow public or staff-only posts. Calendar feeds and Discord channel mirroring cover course events; LTI 1.3 integrations with Canvas, Blackboard, Brightspace, and Moodle are listed as roadmap items. Optional AI-generated test hints and an MCP server for compatible AI clients are also listed. Instructors can use the project-hosted community instance or self-host on Kubernetes with Helm charts. The project is GPLv3 open source. The free community instance is for evaluation; ongoing use at scale requires contacting the project.

RubriqFlow is a web platform for higher education institutions evaluating student portfolios for academic credit. Students submit documents, artifacts, and evidence of prior learning for faculty review. Faculty score submissions against weighted criteria and standardized levels, and those scores map to recommended credits; faculty can override a recommendation with a justification. The workflow runs from submission through credentialing, with an audit trail for credit determinations. RubriqFlow describes a multi-tenant setup with separate organization data, department management, and centralized administration. It lists Student, Faculty, Org Admin, and Super Admin roles, with faculty assigned to subjects to access relevant portfolios. Faculty and staff accounts are free. Student access is $5 a month, billed at $5 per student per semester with no setup fees; enterprise pricing is custom and not listed. The homepage states WCAG 2.1 AA verification and Section 508 support, and reports 33 of 33 tests passed in October 2025. FileDrop states that it operates in compliance with FERPA and uses education records exclusively to evaluate and award prior learning credit. It says portfolio files are privately stored and downloads require authenticated authorization. Enterprise agreements include dedicated support, and a Help Center and Contact Us page are listed.