Emailgistics vs Jelly
Emailgistics
emailgistics.com
Jelly
letsjelly.comSide by side
| Figure | Emailgistics | Jelly |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $13/mo | $26.58/mo |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | Yes | — |
| Plans published | 3 | 4 |
| Spec score · Shared Inbox Software | 8.2 (#11) | 7.8 (#18) |
| Automation | Workflow tools include custom rules, automatic tagging and routing, follow-up reminders, and AI-suggested replies. | Mail rules can automatically label, assign, or archive incoming emails. |
| Collaboration | Features include message ownership, collision prevention, internal notes, and conversation history. | Teammates can be assigned to emails and use internal comments with @mentions. |
| Integrations | The product is built for Microsoft 365 and works inside Outlook; its pricing page also lists a reporting API and received-message webhooks. | The maker lists Discord, Slack, and webhook integrations; its Slack integration can post notifications and let teammates claim unassigned conversations from Slack. |
| Product | Emailgistics adds assignment, workflow automation, SLA monitoring, and reporting to Microsoft 365 shared mailboxes inside Outlook. | Jelly is a shared inbox for small teams to collaboratively triage, assign, and reply to email. |
| Security | Emailgistics says it has achieved SOC 2 Type II certification and identifies itself as GDPR- and HIPAA-compliant. | Customer data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and sensitive customer data is additionally encrypted at the application layer with AES-256-GCM. |
| Support | Plans include free technical support, a dedicated Success Manager, complimentary onboarding and training, and access to learning lessons. | Jelly advertises support from real humans and directs customers to its Help Center and team contact page. |
Plans
Jelly
- Jelly$29 a month
- Royal Jelly 👑$69 a month
- Jelly$319 a year
- Royal Jelly 👑$690 a year
In their own words
Emailgistics
Emailgistics has no write-up on Specifiction yet; its figures are above.