HOMER vs Telchemy SQmediator
HOMER
sipcapture.orgTelchemy SQmediator
telchemy.comSide by side
| Figure | HOMER | Telchemy SQmediator |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | Free | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Open source | — | — |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | — | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | — |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| Android | — | Yes |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted | Yes | Yes |
| Plans published | 1 | 5 |
| Spec score · VoIP Monitoring Software | 8.3 (#5) | 7.7 (#10) |
| Deployment | The project supports Docker, and the current HOMER repository documents release packages and Docker builds. | SQmediator runs on Linux server hardware or virtual machines and can be deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or in data centers. |
| Founded | 2011 | 1999 |
| Integrations | The site lists HEP/EEP support for Kamailio, OpenSIPS, Captagent, Asterisk, FreeSWITCH, RTPEngine, sipgrep, sngrep, and hepipe. | It sends SNMP traps and provides a SOAP/XML web services interface for client applications to configure the system, retrieve data, and control active tests. |
| Purpose | HOMER is a VoIP and RTC capture framework for analysis and monitoring. | SQmediator monitors and troubleshoots VoIP, video, and data service performance in real time. |
| Security | The site lists payload encryption and TLS support for capture agents. | Telchemy says the application is hardened against attacks including SQL/XSS injection and brute-force password attacks, and has role-based access controls and password rules. |
| Support | Commercial support options listed include development support, 24/7 SLA production support, and advanced training; requests are quote-based. | Telchemy offers customer-portal support tickets, support by contact form or phone, and optional web-based or on-site training. |
Plans
Telchemy SQmediator
- Business EditionPriced on request
- Enterprise EditionPriced on request
- Service Provider EditionPriced on request
- Small Business EditionPriced on request
- Small Service Provider EditionPriced on request
In their own words
HOMER
HOMER is a free framework for capturing VoIP and real-time communications traffic for analysis and monitoring. Its listed tools include search, end-to-end analysis, and packet drill-down, together with call-flow and PCAP capture, statistics, analytics, a REST API, and widgets. Capture agents support HEP3 encapsulation, payload encryption and compression, and TLS. The listed core covers SIP, RTCP, RTCP-XR, WebRTC signaling, and log collection. HEP/EEP integrations include Kamailio, OpenSIPS, Captagent, Asterisk, FreeSWITCH, RTPEngine, sipgrep, sngrep, and hepipe. HOMER 11 is described as an all-in-one HEP capture and API server for the 11.x data lake, with ingest, DuckLake storage, a Node using FlightSQL, and a Coordinator with a REST API. Docker is supported, and the project uses the AGPL-3.0 License. The maker presents HOMER for ITSPs, VoIP providers, and trunk suppliers. Commercial development support, 24/7 SLA production support, and advanced training are available by quote.
Telchemy SQmediator
Telchemy SQmediator monitors and troubleshoots real-time performance for VoIP, video, and data services. It combines passive quality monitoring with active tests, reporting MOS experience scores, QoS metrics, and diagnostics for voice, audio, and video sessions. Listed meeting services include Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Google Meet, GoToMeeting, and Webex; the system can analyze encrypted audio and video streams without decrypting them. Linux, Windows, and Android test agents can simulate calls and test web, email, DNS, DHCP, and SIP services. Dashboards, email alerts, and SNMP traps can flag configured threshold breaches. The multitenant system is designed to manage thousands of customers and sites and millions of end users. It runs on Linux server hardware or virtual machines, on premises, in the cloud, or in data centers. An Oracle or PostgreSQL database is required, and customers set it up themselves using Telchemy's scripts and instructions. Pricing is available on request. Licensing depends on modules, and combining passive monitoring with active testing costs extra.