HOMER

Overview

HOMER combines capture with search and analysis, including advanced search, end-to-end analysis and packet drill-down. That range lets operations teams move from a broad incident to call-flow and packet detail, which is more useful for troubleshooting than a summary-only monitor. The trade-off is that HOMER is a framework to deploy and operate, not a turnkey hosted service.

HOMER 11 is an all-in-one HEP capture and API server for the Homer 11.x data lake. Its documented architecture includes ingest, DuckLake storage, a Node with FlightSQL, and a Coordinator with a REST API. Docker support and release packages offer deployment paths. The AGPL-3.0 license is an important consideration for organizations that plan to modify or incorporate the project into their own stack.

Key features

The capture server supports call-flow and PCAP, statistics and analytics, a REST API, and widgets. These capabilities suit teams that need to investigate captured traffic and integrate capture data into operational workflows, rather than simply watch a dashboard.

Capture agents support HEP3 encapsulation, payload encryption and compression, and TLS. The listed protocol coverage includes SIP, RTCP, RTCP-XR, WebRTC signaling and log collection. The supported integrations span Kamailio, OpenSIPS, Captagent, Asterisk, FreeSWITCH, RTPEngine, sipgrep, sngrep and hepipe, giving operators several ways to feed communications data into the system.

MOS scoring, jitter tracking and packet-loss tracking address call-quality investigation alongside signaling analysis. VQRTCP collection and SIPREC support are optional and disabled by default, so teams that need either should account for enabling them rather than assume they are part of a default setup.

Multi-user LDAP and Radius support provide access-control options for shared installations. Combined with encryption and TLS support on capture agents, these are relevant safeguards for operators handling sensitive communications data.

Pricing

HOMER Open Source: Free. The project is 100% open-source, making it the natural choice for teams that can deploy and maintain their own capture stack without a software subscription. Commercial development support, 24/7 SLA production support and advanced training are available with custom pricing.

Platforms

HOMER supports API, Linux, macOS, self-hosted and web environments. Docker support and release packages give operators deployment options, but the self-hosted model favors teams able to manage infrastructure and the documented HOMER 11 components.

Who it's for

HOMER is aimed at ITSPs, VoIP providers and trunk suppliers. It is particularly suitable for communications operations teams that need packet-level investigation, call-quality metrics and integrations with their signaling infrastructure. Organizations seeking a managed service, or lacking the capacity to operate a capture system, should consider a different approach.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Advanced search, end-to-end analysis and packet drill-down support detailed incident investigation.
• Pros: PCAP and call-flow capabilities, quality metrics, broad protocol coverage and multiple integrations make it relevant across provider environments.
• Pros: The open-source plan is free, with commercial support options for teams that need them.
• Cons: Self-hosted deployment and a multi-component HOMER 11 architecture are a substantial operational commitment compared with a managed monitor.
• Cons: VQRTCP collection and SIPREC are optional and disabled by default, which matters to teams relying on those capabilities.
• Cons: Commercial support is custom pricing, so buyers seeking a fixed support cost will need a quote.

Alternatives

VoIP Monitoring Software is a useful starting point for comparing other options in the category.

• Obkio is worth considering for teams that want a freemium monitoring product with a 14-day free trial and support across mobile and desktop platforms.
• Dotcom-Monitor may suit buyers who need a free plan with up to 25 targets, five-minute monitoring frequency and two monitoring locations.
• Telchemy SQmediator is another option for service providers considering a paid monitoring product.
• Exoprise may suit teams looking for a paid product with a free trial and credit-based pricing.
• VoIP Spear is an alternative for buyers who prefer a paid endpoint-monitoring plan with a stated monthly starting price.
• CallMeter is another paid option with monthly or annual plan terms.
• VoIPmonitor is worth comparing for buyers seeking cloud or on-premise VoIP monitoring; its Cloud 3 channels plan is 22.00 USD per month.
• MultiDSLA is another paid monitoring alternative.

Verdict

Choose HOMER if your team operates VoIP infrastructure and needs open-source capture with detailed search, packet analysis and call-quality metrics. Its combination of provider integrations and capture depth is the main reason to choose it. Look elsewhere if you need a managed service or cannot take on self-hosted deployment and maintenance.