IntegrityLog vs Primero

IntegrityLog is cloud-based whistleblowing software for compliance and ethics teams. It provides case intake forms, custom fields, workflow automation, an audit trail, and reporting dashboards. The dashboard tracks statuses such as unconfirmed, pending, expiring, and managed; automated alerts flag changes to cases. Case records preserve activity for oversight, legal inquiries, and regulatory reviews. Anonymous reports are accepted where local law permits, and compliance officers can contact reporters for further details. Multilingual reporting portals are supported, and audio submissions can use automatic voice distortion. Role-specific and granular permissions limit visibility and support controlled sharing with internal or external stakeholders. Organizations can assign investigators by country or entity and customize reporting channels. The product is available on web, iOS, and Android, with cloud deployment. The paid pricing model is priced on request; the page offers a personalized demo request but does not state a trial duration. The maker is IntegrityLog, founded in 2016 and headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Primero is an open-source information management platform for protection-related data. Its use cases include child protection and gender-based violence case management, incident monitoring, and family tracing and reunification. Case workflows span identification, registration, assessment, planning, referrals and transfers, and closure, with supervision, notifications and tasking tools. The platform lists CPIMS+, GBVIMS+ and MRMIMS+ modules, along with intake forms, custom fields, audit trails and reporting dashboards. Teams can configure forms, roles, lookups, reports, languages, logos and locations through a self-service interface. Primero is available in more than 40 languages. Its v2 progressive web app works online and offline in modern browsers on mobile devices, tablets and laptops, though offline use is limited to creating cases and editing records already accessed in the session; changes submit after reconnection. A free DIY tier requires implementers to manage infrastructure and support. Full Service SaaS costs $8,250 a year, while Hybrid deployment costs $25,000 a year for the first year and decreases to the Tier 3 cost in year two and thereafter.