IntegrityLog

Overview

IntegrityLog is cloud-based whistleblowing software for organisations that need a formal route for receiving and managing reports. It is best suited to compliance teams—and advisors handling cases for multiple clients—that need controlled access and traceable case activity. Its strongest case is structured oversight; buyers should weigh jurisdictional limits on anonymous reporting and custom pricing before proceeding.

Key features

Intake forms, custom fields and workflow automation help teams collect reports consistently and route work through defined processes. A dashboard distinguishes unconfirmed, pending, expiring and managed cases, while automated alerts flag status changes. That combination gives compliance teams a way to monitor work requiring attention rather than relying on a static case list.

The archive preserves case-related activity for internal oversight, legal inquiries and regulatory reviews. Role-specific permissions restrict visibility to authorised users, and granular controls support sharing with internal or external stakeholders. These are practical safeguards for sensitive investigations, though organisations still need to decide who should see each case and information shared beyond the team.

Anonymous reports are accepted only where local law permits. Compliance officers can contact reporters for follow-up, and audio submissions with automatic voice distortion provide an additional reporting channel. Localised portals support multilingual environments. Organisations operating across jurisdictions should confirm that their reporting channels and anonymity settings fit each applicable law.

Setup supports assigning investigators by country or entity and tailoring reporting channels to organisational policies and branding. Advisors can manage multiple clients through one dashboard, with client onboarding, pre-built workflows and granular access controls. Euronext also points to legal providers and partners who can help define policies or handle reports and escalations fully or in part. That support may suit teams that need outside process expertise, but it does not remove the need to agree how responsibilities are divided.

IntegrityLog also includes agenda templates, recurring meetings, decision tracking and action-item tracking. These features connect governance discussions with recorded decisions and follow-up, though buyers focused only on whistleblowing may not need the meeting-management breadth. It is presented alongside Euronext products including InsiderLog, LEI Services and Admincontrol Board Portal.

Pricing

IntegrityLog is paid, with custom pricing on request. The product page offers a personalised demo request; it gives no public price or trial duration. There are no published plan tiers, seat allowances or usage caps to compare, so prospective buyers should request a quote and establish the relevant terms before budgeting. This sales-led approach may work for organisations seeking a tailored discussion, but it makes upfront cost comparisons difficult.

Platforms

IntegrityLog runs in the cloud and supports web, Android and iOS. That gives teams browser and mobile access without a listed self-hosted deployment option.

Who it's for

IntegrityLog is a fit for organisations whose compliance teams need structured whistleblowing intake, case monitoring, access controls and an activity record. Its multi-client dashboard and onboarding workflows also suit advisors managing client reporting processes. It is less compelling for buyers seeking only meeting management, or for organisations that require anonymous reporting regardless of local legal restrictions.

Pros and cons

Pros: Status dashboards and automated alerts help teams spot reports that are pending, expiring or unconfirmed.

Pros: An activity archive, role-based access and granular sharing controls support oversight of sensitive cases.

Pros: Multilingual portals, distorted-voice audio reporting and advisor-oriented multi-client management accommodate varied reporting setups.

Cons: Anonymous reporting depends on local law, so the available channel can differ by jurisdiction.

Cons: Custom pricing and no stated trial duration leave buyers without a public price benchmark or defined trial period.

Cons: Meeting-tracking tools add breadth that may be unnecessary for teams buying solely for whistleblowing casework.

Alternatives

Consider Casebook if a small team needs a published entry point: its Starter plan costs $29 a month with annual payment for up to 3 users, and includes Optional Forms, SSO and Changemakers. Choose Case Closed Software if broad platform support, including self-hosted and Linux options, is more important; it uses custom pricing.

UiPath Maestro Case Management is another option. ServiceNow HR Service Delivery may suit buyers looking for HR service delivery; its HR Foundation plan includes 25K indexed documents for HR Knowledge Search and unlimited Virtual Agent conversations. Consider Pega Investigative Case Management as another investigative case-management option.

Hyland OnBase is worth considering if a free plan or a self-hosted deployment matters; its Base subscription lists 100 named users. Optimax Case Management is another case-management alternative. Tracker is a distinct option if its free plan is useful: it includes 2 hours of multi-track recordings, video up to 720p and 44.1 kHz audio, with a watermark.

For broader category comparisons, browse Case Management Software, Board Management Software or Meeting Management Software.

Verdict

Choose IntegrityLog if your organisation or advisory practice needs a cloud-based whistleblowing workflow with case-status oversight, controlled sharing and records suited to later review. Its meeting and advisor features broaden its usefulness, but buyers should look elsewhere if anonymous reporting must be uniform across jurisdictions or if they need a public price and clear trial terms before engaging sales.