Best Event Abstract Management Software in 2026
Updated
In short: Congressio is ranked #1 of 29 as of 7 October 2026, ahead of Fourwaves and HotCRP. The best-ranked option with a free plan is Fourwaves. The lowest first paid tier on this page is SimplyConf at $2.42/mo.
Managing event abstracts means handling submissions and the review process around them. Compare review workflow, blind review, scoring tools, and author revisions, along with submission types and poster handling, to see how each option fits your event. Publishing tools may matter once reviews are complete; free-plan availability and paid-from pricing add cost context. Congressio, Fourwaves, and HotCRP are among the entries. Weigh the listed capabilities against the materials you accept and the decisions your organizers need to manage.
29 event abstract management software ranked on what their makers publish — plans and prices, free tiers, platforms and the facts on their own pages.
Compare all 25 in a table
| # | Tool | Score | Free plan | From | Free plan | Paid from | Submission types | Review workflow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Congressio | 7.4 | Free plan | $40.83/mo | Yes | — | multiple | custom |
| 2 | Fourwaves | 7.3 | Free plan | $83.25/mo | Yes | 999 /yr | — | — |
| 3 | HotCRP | 7.2 | Free plan | Free | Yes | — | — | — |
| 4 | Indico | 7.2 | Free plan | Free | Yes | — | — | — |
| 5 | ConfTool | 7.1 | Free plan | Free | Yes | — | — | — |
| 6 | SimplyConf | 7.1 | Free plan | $2.42/mo | Yes | 29 /yr | — | — |
| 7 | OpenConf | 7.0 | Free plan | — | Yes | — | — | — |
| 8 | EasyChair | 6.9 | Free plan | Free | Yes | — | — | — |
| 9 | Oxford Abstracts | 6.9 | Free plan | Free | Yes | — | abstracts | — |
| 10 | Sciencesconf | 6.9 | Free plan | Free | Yes | — | multiple | multi_stage |
| 11 | Linklings | 6.8 | No | — | — | — | multiple | custom |
| 12 | Microsoft CMT | 6.8 | Free plan | Free | Yes | — | — | — |
| 13 | PeerSubmit | 6.8 | No | — | No | 100 /yr | multiple | custom |
| 14 | Ex Ordo | 6.7 | No | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | Lynk | 6.7 | Free plan | Free | Yes | — | papers | — |
| 16 | OpenReview | 6.7 | Free plan | Free | Yes | — | — | — |
| 17 | OpenWater Grant Management | 6.5 | No | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | AMS (Article Management System) | 6.4 | No | $18.67/mo | No | 299 /yr | papers | — |
| 19 | Eventact | 6.4 | No | $210/mo | No | — | — | — |
| 20 | CATALYST | 6.3 | No | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | Congirus | 6.3 | No | — | — | — | multiple | — |
| 22 | START Conference Manager | 6.3 | No | — | No | — | multiple | custom |
| 23 | joyn | 5.8 | No | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | Brownbag | 5.7 | Free plan | Free | Yes | — | papers | — |
| 25 | Symposio | 5.7 | No | — | No | — | abstracts | multi_stage |
Is your tool on this list?
Numbered spots on this list can be sponsored, and a sponsored row is labelled as paid.
Questions about this list
Which event abstract management software is ranked first on Specifiction?
Congressio is ranked #1 of 29 with a score of 7.4. Fourwaves is second and HotCRP third.
How many of these have a free plan?
14 of the 25 on this page publish a free plan on their own pricing pages.
Which is the cheapest paid option?
On this page, SimplyConf has the lowest first paid tier we found: $2.42/mo.
How is this list ranked?
Ranked on what each maker publishes, the fullest spec sheet first: how deeply the product is documented, the platforms it runs on, a free tier or trial to test it, and its standing.








